Opera Innovation

OI Insights | Q&A with Award-winning Scenic and Costume Designer Leslie Travers

 
Award-winning Scenic and Costume Designer Leslie Travers. Photo via Linkedin.

Award-winning Scenic and Costume Designer Leslie Travers. Photo via Linkedin.

 

(Santa Fe, NM) - Here at Opera Innovation HQ, there’s one production of Salome by which all others are compared (and we’re not even talking about the artists on stage or in the pit, as incredible as they were). Santa Fe Opera’s 2015 production, designed by Leslie Travers and directed by Daniel Slater, happened to be my introduction to Richard Strauss’ one-act opera. Travers and Slater brilliantly constructed their Salome inside the pre-WW1 world of Freudian-infused Viennese high society, with a revolving set that took this opera goer on psychological journey we’ll never forget. Mr. Slater’s direction was critical to the success of this production, but Mr. Travers’ visual storytelling, fused with Strauss’ music and Hedwig Lachmann’s libretto, made Salome absolutely indelible for us.

I didn’t have the opportunity to meet Mr. Travers until a few years later, but we’ve stayed in touch across social media, and early last year I was thrilled for his upcoming 2020 Rusalka with Ailyn Pérez (we’re hoping Santa Fe will reschedule).

 
 

We’ve shared the global equalizer of COVID together, but our individual experiences remain our own. For far too many, it’s been a terrifying or, sadly, deadly experience. Almost exactly a year ago, the pandemic already sweeping the world, I happened to catch one of Mr. Travers’ first tweets about recovering from this disease. It was a terrible shock since I hadn’t yet personally known anymore who’d been exposed or was ill. I sent a message of support and received a positive message in return, as I watched him continue to work as he recovered through the summer, something we explored further during a phone conversation in early January 2021, with the intent of creating this Q&A. We’re convinced that as terrible as COVID was for him, Travers has undoubtedly emerged an even more dedicated and inspired artist. JM


OI: Based on our conversation in early January, my takeaway then and now was that you've moved to a more powerful place as an artist, a creative. Even after experiencing the terror and unknowableness of COVID-19, I heard fortitude and a sense of excitement in your voice. You mentioned how at the beginning of the pandemic, you'd quickly pivoted to remote with assistants working in Lebanon and Chicago, staying flexible, even as declination letters began to pour in. That, in your words, this beginning of loss was eventually followed by a letting go of what was, creating space for discovery and new ways to move forward and stay active. Depending upon where each of us lives, how 2021 will play out for opera and the population at large remains an open question. How are you approaching the next several months to a year? Any predictions?

LT: Undoubtedly this time had been challenging but I feel highly optimistic.  I have been much more closely involved with companies as they explore the way ahead. Being adaptable and flexible as well as helpful absolutely work best at the moment. I think we will have an uplift of creativity. Look at history.  In the meantime anything we can do to make sure our industries survive is worth pursuing. 

“Art is so much more than an entertainment, it is survival and it gives acceptance of the inevitable. I listened to music when I felt at my most ill and it was a total experience. I lived it.”

OI: I nearly fell out of my chair when you said that you designed a show for La Scala when you were feeling most ill. Many of us have probably wondered  how we'd cope if we were isolated at home, ill with COVID. And then you went and answered that very question - you created, you challenged your situation and did your best to stay on course. Not to embarrass you, but that example of artistic determination is something I'll always remember when faced with difficult challenges, professional or otherwise. You mentioned how this has all positively impacted your creative process, given you greater awareness, insight on how to "be kind to yourself," and the ability to work and produce in a calmer way. Could you speak to these profound personal and professional discoveries?

LT: COVID-19 is a mysterious and brutal illness. You can’t fight it, it does what it wants with you. I was extremely aware of that at the time. In my moments of lucidity within the illness the thought of work gave me some vibrancy. Art is so much more than an entertainment, it is survival and it gives acceptance of the inevitable. I listened to music when I felt at my most ill and it was a total experience. I lived it. That time has left a mark on me in a positive way. I feel enormously happy to be here and to continue with my work. 

“I have had a lot of time to work on process, to look at how I extract or uncover the visual world from an opera. I am cursed, or blessed, with a lot of nervous energy.  Even in lockdown work has  remained a thrill ride of exploration. I guess you channel the attributes you have.” - Leslie Travers

OI: The UK was mostly in lockdown when we spoke, but you mentioned how returning to your London studio was a joy i.e. re-engaging your creative process in a more thoughtful way; that you loved the "layering" of this process i.e. building theoretical and then physical environments for singers to inhabit, interact with and then bring to life through story and music. You also mentioned how "the design process is isolating, not sociable" while the onstage element (presumably in a city or urban area) is the exact opposite, with multiple, one to one and one to many opportunities to listen, interact and collaborate. For years, I've gotten lost in your beautiful Facebook photos of the coast and sea taken from your home in Ballycastle, County Antrim. You actually brought it up when you mentioned how this "rural focus" allows you to concentrate more on the dramaturgy of a given work, "looking at the music in deeper, more concentrated ways with less distraction." You also mentioned how 2020 made this all the more apparent for you, and has changed your work in "a positive way." Would love to hear more about this rural / urban dichotomy, and how it continues to help you in new and perhaps improved ways. 

LT: I like the contrast of working in both environments. The “rural focus” is intense and open. I can ask the big questions of the work here in North Antrim and think freely and playfully. London is executing the work, making models and drawings. I will divide my time between the two places and to explore how this influences and how it enhances my work. 

“Work in progress in the studio. #design #theatre” | Follow Leslie Travers on Twitter.

“Work in progress in the studio. #design #theatre” | Follow Leslie Travers on Twitter.

OI: Having literally survived 2020, the new year is here, as is the potential for better things ahead. What’s happening in your world?

LT: I have been working with the Israel Opera. I’ve delivered a production and I haven’t even been to Israel yet. I feel that I’ve gotten to know the (Israel Opera) staff in a much more personal way. Even over Zoom!  It’s been a joy. I’m also looking forward to opening Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg in Wagner’s home town of Leipzig. It’s a thrill to do Wagner in Germany. I’m also on an exciting adventure with Bartók for Greek National Opera and exploring working in film, but in the right way for me. Right now, I can say that I’m working with a filmmaker in the United States who has a liberating and joyously abstract view of the world.  

 

Read Leslie Travers’ recent interview in The Scenographer magazine.

Follow Leslie Travers on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

Exercises on The Presence of Odradek: Translating a Live Production for the Virtual Stage

 
Photo: Bare Opera and Culture Hub NYC

Photo: Bare Opera and Culture Hub NYC

By Briana E. Hunter

(New York, NY) - We are now months into the quarantine, and the realities of the global pandemic have created a new normal. The hustle and bustle of daily life has come to a crashing halt. Restaurants have closed table-service, clothing stores have locked their doors, and businesses have sent their employees home. 

Like so many other institutions, opera companies around the world shuttered their doors amid the threat of a global pandemic. Performances were cancelled and artists sent home. With voices trained to reach the balconies of grand opera houses, these artists must settle for a more modest venue. For some, their (miniscule) apartments are their new stage. For others, it is a childhood bedroom. Their new audience? The vacuums left leaning against walls and the opera scores they’ve accumulated over the years.  

To be clear, we are the lucky ones, the ones who can afford to remain in isolation. And yet, despite our privileges, this new normal is maddening for artists who gain energy through communal experiences. All have mourned missed openings or debuts. Many now sing into tiny cameras on phones and tablets, seeking connection. And while social media and virtual connectivity provide a temporary salve, we still long for a return to the stage. We miss being immersed in the delicious, resonant experience of musical collaboration.

Bare Opera is no exception to this upheaval. In a co-production with Culture Hub NYC, Bare was set to produce “The Presence of Odradek” just as the COVID-19 crisis shook New York City to its core in March. When it became apparent that an in-person show would no longer be possible, the team worked quickly to reimagine Odradek for a virtual medium. By incorporating virtual reality (VR) technologies, the show promises an immersive experience in your living room. 

Sneak peek of our live, online world premiere on May 12, 2020 of new opera The Presence of Odradek by David Rosenmeyer. Combining dance, opera, live projecti...

Overall, our approach gestures to a potential solution for opera in the time of Coronavirus. To better understand our redirect to virtual performances, I chatted with Odradek’s creative team about their approach and how they managed to successfully innovate and pivot toward an online platform. 

I began with Director, Singer, and Creator Malena Dayen, and composer David Rosenmeyer (who also happens to be her husband).

B:  When did you find out the live performances wouldn’t be possible for this show, and at what stage were you in the process?

M: In March, we were in the middle of workshops when we realized that we had to change our plans. We decided to explore the possibilities of live streaming, trying to stay as live and creative as we could.

B: What were the biggest challenges you faced in converting your original production to a VR online live experience?

M: When we started working on the live streaming idea, we decided not to try to replace the theatre experience, but to play and have fun with the new rules. Most of the ideas we were working on originally adapted and evolved in the VR performance, others we had to give up. The issues with the sound, mixing live performances from different locations, at times combined with pre-recorded video, was challenging from a technical point of view. 

D: It was definitely a challenge (musically) and in certain parts I had to accompany a singer without actually hearing/listening to him, but having their video stream on a monitor so I could calculate the moments to be together based on the movement of his lips. 

M: [She laughs]…we tried different creative ways, and we’re still trying to make it better in the upcoming performances. Overall I thought the VR online live experience was exciting and I can’t wait to keep working in this medium, even after we are allowed back into the theatre!

B: I couldn’t agree more. The VR experience was unreal!  Malena, can you tell us a little bit about how you met Sangmin (Video/Tech designer)? 

M: When I started directing (I started as an opera singer), I enrolled in an MFA at CUNY Brooklyn College to study Performance and Interactive Media Arts.  That’s where I met Sangmin Chae, [he] was my classmate. 

B: That’s right, this is not the first time you and Sangmin, and even Troy (choreographer) have worked together.

M: Yes, [Sangmin and I] collaborated on several projects together, including my three (past) productions with Bare Opera: Piazzolla’s “Maria de Buenos Aires,” “Don Giovanni,” and now “Exercises on the Presence of Odradek.” Troy Ogilvie also collaborated in all three [above] productions. She’s an amazing choreographer who creates very poetic and specific languages for each production. Both Sangmin and Troy, as well as my husband, composer David Rosenmeyer, have been involved from the beginning in this project.

B: We absolutely love working with you all and are so happy you have continued to produce work with us.  How did you come up with the concept for this show…what’s it about? 

M:“The Presence of Odradek” is based on Franz Kafka’s “The Cares of a Family man.”  It plays with Kafka’s text as well as poems by Avot Yeshurun, exploring how art is able to give presence to absence.

D: As for the music, Malena and I would have long conversations about the piece.  Our vision for the stage (which later became the video screen), the topics that interested us, and the techniques we wanted to explore, like making a collage with improvisations. Then I’d just let it marinate inside me until a deadline forced it to become something to share... 

B: Well, I think we are all experiencing the very large presence of absence all over the world.  What do you want the audience to take away from the experience?

M: There’s really no wrong way to experience this piece.  I hope our audiences join us with curiosity and sensibility. I hope they enjoy the agency they have to explore VR and the chat functions, as they wish. I hope they find this piece both mysterious and revealing at the same time.

Screen capture from “Exercises on The Presence of Odradek” | Photo: Bare Opera and Culture Hub NYC

Screen capture from “Exercises on The Presence of Odradek” | Photo: Bare Opera and Culture Hub NYC

Inspired by Malena and David, I knew I needed to talk to Sangmin Chae (the magician behind the video/tech engineering) and find out more about his VR world.

B: Could you talk a bit about the technology behind Odradek?  How do we get these incredible effects and visuals?

S: Our plan was to use a variety of holographic techniques for the performances, but we had to make a lot of technical changes due to the COVID-19 situation. So, we chose VR technology. We received a lot of help from Culturehub. I’m currently working there as a Creative Technologist where I develop, test, and implement various technologies for artists.  In particular, we are studying VR, AR, and Telepresence, and in this performance, we applied various VR technologies and cylinder hologram technologies to the performance.

B: For those of us who are less tech literate, what does that all mean?

SVR refers to experiencing a virtual world through VR devices that block the real world. Because 360-degree virtual reality unfolds, it is called VR to experience a perfect virtual space that is far from reality! On the contrary, AR is a technology that overlaps three-dimensional virtual interest based on the real world, such as the background environment, based on the location information system based on gyroscope information. What we have in common is that we both have to create a virtual world. Telepresence technology is a technology that remotely brings people from afar and makes them look like they're in the same space. It is mainly used for video conferencing, and I incorporated it into the performance.

B: Thank you Sangmin, this is fascinating.  I can’t wait to see what you come up with in the future!

S: Thank you, Briana!

Screen capture from “Exercises on The Presence of Odradek” | Photo: Bare Opera and Culture Hub NYC

Screen capture from “Exercises on The Presence of Odradek” | Photo: Bare Opera and Culture Hub NYC

Lastly, I caught up with choreographer Troy Ogilvie.

B: What are the differences in designing movement/choreography for the physical space versus the VR world?

T: I enjoy the intimacy and controlled agency of VR. I find that there’s a delicious intimacy in dance that more easily translates into film than onstage, simply because proscenium productions typically require more distance. Even if we are able to curate that kind of intimacy - the sound of fabric, a finger tracing an elbow - in maybe a more immersive setting, there is still a lot of room for distraction while on film you get to be really clear about what is paid attention to. What we gain in intimacy and control, we lose by severing that electric, irreplaceable synergy between performers and audience that exists when everyone shares the same physical space.

B: This is not your first time working with Sangmin and Malena, what makes your collaborations so special and unique? Describe your process of working together.

T: Malena always brings these incredibly inspiring ideas and references to our first meetings about a project. I can't help but get excited about the material and her thoughts. She then gives me such trust and freedom that I really feel like I do my best work when collaborating with her. I have worked less directly with Sangmin, but as far as I'm concerned he's a magician and I'm always blown away by what he creates.

B: How would you describe your artistic voice?

T: Ha! Good question. My answer will probably be a bit sideways. I’m interested in movement that is untranslatable - that is itself and neither a metaphor nor pantomime (which is its own art form!).  I search for movement that is direct. The same way that effective poetry cuts through prose's syntactical red tape, I hope that my choreography - which is always in collaboration with the performer - cuts through affectations of style and this idea of “dance for dance's sake.”  I also love a show! It's always fun to find the most resonant tension between abstraction and entertainment so that you can both charm and challenge your audience.

My sincere thanks to Malena, David, Sangmin, and Troy for their time and unique insights!

LEARN MORE ABOUT

“Exercises on The Presence of Odradek”

Please follow us on all social media platforms, including @bareopera on Twitter / Instagram, and Facebook for updates and subscribe to our YouTube Channel.  


Briana Elyse Hunter is Bare Opera’s Marketing and Communications Director.

A mezzo soprano “of astounding vocal and dramatic range,” Briana is represented by Aaron Grant at L2 Artists

 

American Opera's 'Innovate or Die' Moment

 
Photo: Ken Howard | The Santa Fe Opera’s 2016 production of Mozart’s “Don Giovanni” | Set Design: Riccardo Hernandez

Photo: Ken Howard | The Santa Fe Opera’s 2016 production of Mozart’s “Don Giovanni” | Set Design: Riccardo Hernandez

By James B. Mowdy

(Santa Fe, NM) - As coronavirus rockets around the planet, billions of us are grappling with a new reality, doing our best to accept the absolute disruption of life as we knew it. As this frightening new normal dawns upon us, we’re realizing that our health security has been questionable for months, and that our ability to gather in public spaces is either curtailed or outlawed, with perhaps more of the same for months or years to come. 

For weeks, we’ve been isolated since no one is safe from the Great Equalizer of COVID-19, an infection with an unknowable prognosis. Some of us might already be infected, suffering mildly or acutely at home or fully asymptomatic. Cooped up, we’ve watched China, South Korea, Italy, Spain, France, the UK, Louisiana, Georgia, South Dakota and New York City explode with infection, with dozens to hundreds to thousands of deaths per day. Hospitals around the world are overtaxed and undersupplied. We’re at war.

Milan’s La Scala closed on February 23rd. The Metropolitan Opera followed suit on March 12th, cancelling all of March’s performances, and then a week later cancelling what remained of the season. Opéra de Paris, LA Opera, San Francisco Opera, The Royal Opera and festivals such as Opera Theatre of Saint Louis, Garsington and Aix en Provence followed, as coronavirus silences live operatic performance around the globe, without any reasonable assurance of safety until a vaccine is found.

And here we are.

Since February, I’ve had in-person, FaceTime, WhatsApp, Twitter and Instagram conversations about how the world’s greatest art form could survive and flourish in the United States, including how it could evolve into a sturdier, more equitable, sustainable and transparent industry that works for all, such as soloists and musicians dealt the cruel blow of force majeure.

Opera Saratoga’s Artistic and General Director Lawrence Edelson was recently interviewed on New York’s Classical WMHT-FM. Discussing Saratoga’s cancellation of its 2019 season, Edelson touched on the challenges opera faces in a dramatically altered performance environment, as well as the need for “proactive thinking.” Citing the immediate benefits of opera’s pivot to online channels, Edelson said that streaming can’t replace live opera performance (mostly agreed on this point). Edelson also raised practical questions, too. How do opera companies enforce social distancing and remain sustainable? How are restrooms, the box office, concessions and intermissions handled? And, perhaps most critically, how do performers and musicians manage close proximity to each other? Mr. Edelson didn’t claim to have answers to these questions, but he’s in the process of bringing fellow opera professionals together for high-level discussions on “how to share the performing arts” now and post-COVID-19.

I was pleased to hear Edelson say that he and his colleagues are “ethically bound to proceed with care“ since opera and classical music audiences typically skew older. Per Edelson: “We’re talking about COVID-19 right now…we’ve been very reactive to (coronavirus) because we’ve been forced to” but “the best way to predict the future is to create it,” paraphrasing a quote by Peter Drucker, the godfather of modern business management. His closing thoughts perfectly distilled the moment. “We are going to have to create a future where there is a wider variety of ways we can enjoy live performance. And I don’t think this means that traditional theatre-going is going to disappear, I certainly hope not because I love it. But I think it would be naïve to believe that the world is not going to change as a result of what we’re living through right now. I’d rather be on the front end of that change than chasing after it from behind.”

Figuratively looking outward from the stage, Mr. Edelson says that opera must reimagine how it engages live audiences. But shouldn’t American opera also spin on its heels to honestly assess, stress-test and reimagine how it works with the armies of creatives building their careers?

I’ve often said that opera singers and classical musicians are the original gig economy. But today’s gig economy hasn’t worked out that well for millions of Americans, even before the pandemic. The “company” person of earlier generations has disappeared; loyalty is limited and ultimately not required because everyone is an independent contractor. Like classical artists, tech professionals often work without job security, jockeying from employer to employer for the best, high-value experience, hopefully trading up to achieve some sense of financial security, a modicum of professional success or renown. As in opera, some in tech become wildly successful, perhaps as a star engineer, founder or major VC. But the similarities mostly end there. Tech professionals generally maintain or improve upon the lifestyle they’ve built, with the freedom to work remotely as needed or desired. Alternatively, and with rare exception, opera singers and classical musicians must be “at the office” to earn their living i.e. performing onstage, in a recording studio or at a special event. They must also continually hone their craft via lessons, practice, and other professional training at their own expense, which could mean additional side gigs just to keep the plates of their careers spinning.

Fortunately, there are US opera companies innovating right now and/or making decisions influenced by brand values and a laudable sense of business ethics. For example, Pittsburgh Festival Opera has reimagined its summer intensive as an “Online Young Artists Program”, utilizing recordings, podcast interviews, social media, and candid videos to maintain its audience until public gatherings are once again possible. It’s also significant to note that Houston Grand OperaLA Opera, Long Beach Opera and Opera Theatre of St. Louis are compensating staff (with some furloughs), as well as artists to varying degrees, in spite of cancelled seasons and ongoing uncertainty. Concurrently, The AGMA Soloist Coalition, formed in early 2020, is doing an excellent job spotlighting artist-supportive efforts by various American companies, working within the AGMA union to better address concerns and issues specific to soloists, which in turn strengthens their union. The coalition’s arrival couldn’t have come at a better time. As anyone who works in opera or follows the industry knows, there have been critical, and in some cases, recent moments when US companies have operated in a somewhat secretive fashion or exercised a kind of top down decision-making reminiscent of the Hollywood studio system of the 1930-50s.

This is not a hit piece. Rather, it’s an honest look at some of American opera’s business practices and how the now, mostly discarded mantra of “move fast and break things” should be applied to opera, a shock to the system that could ultimately result in a healthier industry. Because shouldn’t American opera want to be known as an equitable workplace? A workplace with new efficiencies, increased employee/contractor/artist loyalty and productivity? Also, as an industry governed by uniform business ethics and transparency, industry-wide innovations to protect and compensate artists, as well as a sense of proactive responsiveness to impending or potential business impacts? All of these could redefine American opera, creating a new kind of 21st century success for the art form.

The AGMA Soloist Coalition’s platform details specific areas where it seeks to improve artists’ collective standing. Two of those areas are:

  • Pay Structures

  • Manager and Artist Best Practices

Pay Structures

The AGMA Soloist Coalition seeks “ways we can protect ourselves financially in future contracts” while also “implement(ing) changes in the way singers are paid industry-wide.” To say that there’s a bit to explore and improve here is an understatement. Baritone Ryan McKinney, whose artistry I’ve long admired, recently tweeted how it’s important to “support the innovations we are seeing in content being created right now” i.e. during this crisis.

McKinney’s comments were in response to a beautifully distilled thread from tenor and MiddleClassArtist.com’s Zack Finkelstein. Finkelstein was discussing the free streaming of operas as soon as the crisis hit, which I view as a lost opportunity for several companies (more on that soon). Zach’s tweets verbatim:

  • “For foreseeable future, online content will be critical to artist business development and revenue. Streaming premium arts productions for free hampers our ability to survive in 6 months. We're giving away the ipad and hoping people buy it later when we need the cash.”

  • “By broadcasting the works from the peak of our production capacity before social distancing, we are overpromising and setting ourselves up for failure with audience expectations when we try to charge something. Giving out the 2019 ipad and following it up with the 2012 ipod.”

  • We are stifling innovation by giving away pre-covid entertainment online. How can we promote new work and ask people to pay $9.99 for it while competing with a limitless volume of free, flawlessly produced content? Is there room for new DIY albums in a free Met HD world?”

The obvious and easiest solution to this practice (or problem) is a paywall or digital subscription, something that works beautifully for the Medici.tv platform and app. Director David Paul saw it differently, tweeting that “some of the most successful corporations of our time” have used the free sample model to “awaken an appetite that is then worth paying to satisfy later. People are unemployed, we have the ability to give them joy,” and that this approach could “possibly generate new audiences.”

In my mind, Mr. Paul’s response only reinforced Finkelstein’s argument, so I responded, noting that opera is 1) a high-value luxury product and 2) its performance is a luxury brand experience. Why shouldn’t pay walls or monthly/annual subscription fees exist? Why is there no SAG-AFTRA-like artist residual / royalty mechanism for every download, stream or rebroadcast, based on a standard, industry pay per view model used by every American opera company? Could AGMA institute or manage something of this nature? Is a new, AGMA-affiliated body required?

Zach 1.jpg

But Mr. Paul stuck to his argument.

Paul 1.jpg

Mr. Paul also thought it was “absurd” to innovate during the pandemic. I disgreed (apologies for the typo).

Paul 2.jpg

I don’t know Mr. Paul and certainly have nothing against him, but I can’t think of a better time to begin serious discussions on how to restructure the ways American opera compensates creatives, when its way of doing business is forever changed (why I’m glad the AGMA Soloist Coalition is on the case). Apologies to Mr. Paul, but “down the road” just doesn’t fly. The expectation that artists and musicians can simply hang on for an indeterminate amount of time isn’t workable, all the more so during this crisis. 

Back to the pink elephant in the room. Why does the Mecca of American Opera - a bonafide luxury brand - stream its operas for free, the equivalent of leaving money on the table? What luxury brand does that? To be fair, a $14.99/month on-demand video offer is found just below free streaming content, but why make viewers scroll down to pay for this service when the page leads with content that’s free of charge? A compelling, of the moment call to action for purchase is missing. Ultimately, the decision to give away high-value content devalues this company’s one-of-a-kind, high-value work product, as well as the skills of highly-trained, best-in-world artists and musicians who perform live onstage and in perpetuity via free stream, a stream this company’s national and global audience would certainly purchase, just like MetHD. It’s not rocket science to see how pay wall/subscription fees could directly compensate soloists and musicians who lost their incomes when the remainder of the 2019/20 season was cancelled; many of us would be all the more inclined to purchase a streaming subscription if we knew funds were directly helping artists and musicians. A company-wide fundraising appeal could be added, as well, creating an innovative, almost corporate social responsibility-like initiative as PR campaign, publicly demonstrating The Met’s care and concern for the most critically important individuals in its employ, acting as American opera’s flag bearer, bar none. Of course, this could all still happen, so please feel free to forward this blog vers Lincoln Center!

Opera will continue being performed in this county, but what will it look like? Like the global aviation industry, a new and unknown business environment awaits. As previewed earlier by Mr. Edelson, how can the performance business model remain feasible in the age of social distancing? That factor alone changes the dynamic between audiences and performers. How many small to medium companies will fold? If the business of American opera stays the same, what happens when the next crisis arrives, artists and musicians once again holding an even emptier bag? 

Manager and Artist Best Practices

Mr. Edelson proposed action steps during his interview, many of which dovetail nicely into the AGMA Soloist Coaltion’s action plan regarding Manager and Artist Best Practices:

  • The Manager & Artist Best Practices group has been discussing the many issues facing managers and soloists, so we can support each other’s livelihoods as the classical music world rebuilds. We are currently most focused on topics that address immediate concerns in our contracts that have come to light in the midst of the global pandemic.

As the SC takes the lead on advocating and creating change for opera soloists, in concert with the greater AGMA union, the lynchpin dialogue is between soloists and their managers and/or management firms. The more aligned these respective parties become, the more powerful their lobbying abilities will become.

The need for proactive thinking

Mr. Edelson advocated proactive thinking, not reactivity. The SC had already started to think of ways to improve their members’ standing in their industry, prior to the pandemic. My suggestions regarding pay walls, subscriptions, residuals and royalties may not be new, but they should be considered for the benefit of all who work in and profit from opera in the United States. I referenced the Hollywood studio system of the mid-20th century, but perhaps AGMA and the SC could look at today’s Hollywood, the filmmaking industry, unions like SAG-AFTRA and entertainment agencies like CAA, ICM, WME et al to model new structures that compensate and protect artist IP, as well as management firms. When and if these structures come to exist in opera, contracts will evolve to make space for them i.e. business innovation and evolution.

Ethically bound to proceed with care

Bringing opera professionals together

The SC is bringing soloists together to begin working on collective goals with opera companies and their managers, but is this considered a brave or bold move? Are there soloists who are concerned about being associated with this group? Is it considered “activist”? In light of where we are, none of that really matters anymore. Just like Mr. Edelson brainstorms with his opera colleagues, it’s important that the SC and other coalitions in AGMA, as well as other parties across the American opera universe (company leadership, composers, conductors, etc), unify as one to seek common goals that shore up and solidify American opera, institute greater employee/contractor protections and better compensation models. Opera America is already an established, unifying body in American opera. Perhaps OA could become a powerful leader and partner in this effort as well?

Accepting change and leading

Predicting the future by creating it

The SC’s platform and videos already demonstrate a group of talented individuals in full awareness of how their livelihoods are consistently at risk, COVID-19 has only heightened this awareness and acceptance. But this level of acceptance is something everyone who works in opera must find, sooner than not, which includes management, leadership of every American opera company, Opera America and, perhaps most critically, the American opera-going public.

Most movements begin at the grassroots level. The SC is clearly playing that role, but it can’t create lasting change alone. SC’s increased union and management support is key. But US opera’s standard operating procedures will only improve when the opera-going public becomes fully aware of the multiple challenges most artists and musicians face, raising our voice en masse for the “essential workers” of opera, and using our considerable purchasing power and influence to uniformly demand change for the most important people in the room. There will be pain. The meteor of coronavirus will force some companies to shutter. Some might lose their relevancy if they’re unable - or unwilling - to powerfully meet the moment. More nimble organizations could become digital and/or socially-distanced companies or some interesting hybrid of the pre-COVID model and something altogether new, defining opera’s new normal. American Opera 2.0 has already begun its countdown to launch. The trick is not getting left behind.

JM